Jack Schlossberg, the 32-year-old grandson of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, has recently attracted significant attention and criticism due to a series of provocative social media posts involving Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President J.D. Vance. His remarks have ignited debates about appropriateness and respect in public discourse.
The controversy began on January 20, 2025, during President Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony. Schlossberg posted on X (formerly Twitter), asking his followers: “True or false: Usha Vance is way hotter than Jackie O?” This comparison between his late grandmother, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, and Usha Vance was met with immediate backlash. Many users expressed discomfort, pointing out the inappropriateness of comparing his grandmother’s attractiveness to that of another woman. In response to the criticism, Schlossberg acknowledged his misstep, stating, “I’m a literal pervert. I called my grandmother hot… have I totally lost it? Jesus… this kid will do anything for attention.”
The situation escalated further in early April 2025. On April 6, Schlossberg took to social media again, this time joking that he was “having a son” with Usha Vance. He posted an edited image on Instagram depicting Usha holding a baby with his face superimposed, humorously naming the child “Jason Schlossberg.” He captioned the post with, “Excited to announce I’m having a baby with Usha Vance. Out of wedlock. Possibly considering marriage.” This jest was intended as satire, aligning with Schlossberg’s history of using humor to comment on political and social issues. However, it was met with mixed reactions, with some finding it amusing and others deeming it disrespectful and
Schlossberg has a track record of employing satire and provocative humor on social media to blur the lines between reality and fiction, aiming to critique media dynamics and political messaging. In past interviews, he has emphasized the need for more engaging and unexpected communication strategies in politics. Despite his intentions, these recent posts have sparked debates about the boundaries of humor, respect, and the responsibilities of public figures in online discourse.
The public’s reaction to Schlossberg’s comments has been polarized. While some appreciate his attempts at humor and view them as harmless satire, others believe that such remarks are inappropriate, especially given his prominent family background. Critics argue that comparing women’s appearances and making personal jokes about individuals he is not personally connected with crosses a line of decency and respect. Supporters, however, contend that Schlossberg’s approach brings a fresh, albeit unconventional, perspective to political commentary.
As of now, neither Usha Vance nor Vice President J.D. Vance has publicly responded to Schlossberg’s remarks. The incidents have ignited broader discussions about the role of humor in political discourse, the impact of social media on public figures, and the fine line between satire and disrespect. Schlossberg’s actions serve as a reminder of the complexities involved when public figures engage in provocative humor, especially when it involves personal references to others.
